My December fiction dabble, which is in a particular order (best to worst, to my way of thinkin'):
- Cheaper by the Dozen, Frank B. Gilbreth, Ernestine Gilbreth Carey -- of all I read in December, I will think the most and longest about this book. It is the book you want to read passages from with your spouse, the book that makes you laugh, and the one you feel better for having spent time reading. 4/5.
- Children of Men, P. D. James -- entertaining, interesting, and pretty much what I thought it would be. 3/5.
- The Hobbit, J. R. R. Tolkien -- I liked this more upon rereading it, but it was still as dithery and overhyped as I remembered. 3/5.
- The Princess Bride, William Goldman -- I wanted to love this, but I found the secondary story (written as fact, but in reality only more fiction), distracting and irritating. I loved the adventure tale, very much...but if the added layer of Morgenstern 'n' all was really so important, couldn't it have been created without the condescending references to the author's (fictional) wife and child...and adulterous fantasies? I get it, there's a contrast between the two fictions of the book...but talk about buzzkill in amongst buzz. 3/5.
- Lord of the Flies, William Golding -- Blah. Blah blah blah! So much applause for clumsy and cumbersome writing and slow progress! Read as allegory or a story in its own right, either way, it was mostly awful. An aptitude for telling a story that makes a disturbing commentary on our society is not in and of itself a talent. Tell it at least half-well! I remember three quarters of the way through there was finally a poetic and poignant moment, and I was thinking, "What have we been doing all this time?!" and to explain the 2/5 I'm awarding it, I'll close with two excerpts from Golding -- in the first he is describing the island upon which the boys are all stranded;
And that sentence isn't over. Do you want to keep reading it? What is even going on with the punctuation? What? What!?
Another:
Piggy was everywhere, was on this neck, was become terrible in darkness and death.
Blah. I read almost always at night, and reading Golding at night for me means re-reading sentences or entire paragraphs and going, "Wha'? Blah, why would you leave it like that?!"
So, would you rank these titles in reverse?! Ha!
7 comments:
I loathe LOF. I will not teach it. Ever. Ok, maybe if a HOD makes me, but I won't be happy about it.
the hobbit is the longest movie. evvvver.
I was annoyed cos they ended it when they just got to the mountain! ahhhhhhh
I loved both Lord of the Flies and The Hobbit. I enjoy books that are rich in detail and description, books that require concentration and dedication, books that challenge. So many people settle for books that are easy, in the same genre as every other book they have ever read, the same plot structure, the same characters re-hashed under a new name or dilemma. Sometimes I think (with the success of such atrocities as "50 Shades of Grey") the literary world is experiencing a huge dumbing down, millions of people who want their plot and prose easy, fast and handed to them on a plate - just like everything else in life. I feel like leading a revolution in non-lazy reading - stepping outside your comfort zone - just like you have done here, Angela. PS I know my opinion is unpopular and people take offence, which is certainly not my intention, but it always happens so I apologize in advance if I ruffle anyone's feathers. I do maintain however that life is too short to limit yourself to the Whitcoulls Top 10 Picks.
So so happy you loved Cheaper by the Dozen. The sequel is just as good (my mom says better).
Oh Nicole, I wouldn't blame you -- although many a youth has read that book at school, and never forgotten it. I think Ender's Game is an excellent alternative for similar themes and a similar age group. My class at an all boys school loved it.
Helen Peters -- what a thoughtful comment! Thank you for posting it! There is definitely a demand for the watered-down lit you describe.
That said, I do not enjoy Virginia Woolf, George Eliot, James Joyce, or Janet Frame as much as I do many contemporaries. I'm sure you'll agree, time is not the only qualifier for "quality writing" -- there are exceptions in both cases -- "classics" which are not as well-written as one would hope, and modern novels with depth, punch, and incredible talent evident throughout. I'm with you most of the time -- happy to work through detail for a story -- Jane Austen and Charlotte Bronte are two of my favourite authors. It helps that they could write. Golding's imagery, writing style, and overall seedy pessimism are not to my taste, celebrated author or not. I'm glad you found things to celebrate in his work. You are most surely not alone!
I guess what frustrates me is people who never even try! They just say "Oh, it's too hard, I'll just read "50 Shades". I had to sit through Jane Eyre twice armed with a dictionary before I really got into it, and now it is one of my favourite books! I wholeheartedly respect the fact that Golding is not your cup of tea (have you heard about his unpublished autobiography? Yikes) and give you props for trying it. For the life of me I cannot enjoy Virginia Woolf either...but I do love Eliot! Happy reading to you :)
You've inspired me to go back and read both the Princess Bride and Lord of the Flies. The PB was one of my favorite books as a kid (including the backstory) and I do remember really liking LotF, but that was 20 years ago. Now I'm curious to see if it will hold up for me. I promised one of my institute students I'd read the Hobbit if he would read Pride and Prejudice. I've been putting it off because the last time I read Tolkien I wanted to die. Oh, the tree poetry and all the walking.
Post a Comment